the potterworldmc feedback and suggestions section has seen it all since its inception: terrible, mid, incredible ideas! reasonable and fair criticism, whining. womp womp'ing, yapping.
anyways! i'm here to debate that, for the health of the section and its inhabitants, some of the guidelines in the information thread should be enforced as rules which all players should abide to and that all threads posted, following this change, which break those rules should be declined or outright deleted without considering the suggestion, while also given a proper reasoning to encourage healthy conversation by a better repost. the rules i mostly want to be enforced are guideline 1 and 4
for how long are we planning to whine that the poltergeist team doesn't handle the forums well when we're the first to put no effort in behaving with orderly manner?
i shall now start by showcasing threads that could save a lot of wasted time on unnecessary dealings and increase feedback efficiency if they were decent to begin with:
thread 1 - my dog would have come up with a better thread that could have given staff actual motivation to answer this in much less than 6 months and with deserved consideration (guideline 1 ignored)
thread 2 | thread 3 | thread 4 | thread 5 | thread 6 | thread 7 (actually complaint since it's about more bags in general and not the single specific bags) | thread 8 - truly the potterworld of all time, i wonder how the team is still sane by having to handle suggestions like this quite often where they have to handle a morbillion stuff in one thread and be expected to answer as quickly as they do with threads that have just one suggestion (guideline 4 found dead in a ditch)
if you happen to have been called out in this thread don't take it too personally, it's normal to get a little silly if "rules" are not enforced, but be mindful that you can't pretend the seriousness and timeliness you deserve if this is how it is
i could have gone for longer with threads but i can't bother reading 4 years worth of threads history to prove a very valid point in my honest opinion, i mostly chose threads that were brought up recently and that have been ignored for some time / been answered very late / are still early but i needed examples
i might consider writing a post about guideline 3, involving proper regulation on duplicates i have never seen to avoid getting a post ignored just because it was declined 4 years ago, so if you like this post i might actually do that
i hope this thread enforces the idea that if we want to have better forums we should start by being the change it needs, but also needs to deserve, instead of throwing piles of dirt on volunteers because you don't feel listened (read guideline 7 and 9)
anyways! i'm here to debate that, for the health of the section and its inhabitants, some of the guidelines in the information thread should be enforced as rules which all players should abide to and that all threads posted, following this change, which break those rules should be declined or outright deleted without considering the suggestion, while also given a proper reasoning to encourage healthy conversation by a better repost. the rules i mostly want to be enforced are guideline 1 and 4
for how long are we planning to whine that the poltergeist team doesn't handle the forums well when we're the first to put no effort in behaving with orderly manner?
i shall now start by showcasing threads that could save a lot of wasted time on unnecessary dealings and increase feedback efficiency if they were decent to begin with:
thread 1 - my dog would have come up with a better thread that could have given staff actual motivation to answer this in much less than 6 months and with deserved consideration (guideline 1 ignored)
thread 2 | thread 3 | thread 4 | thread 5 | thread 6 | thread 7 (actually complaint since it's about more bags in general and not the single specific bags) | thread 8 - truly the potterworld of all time, i wonder how the team is still sane by having to handle suggestions like this quite often where they have to handle a morbillion stuff in one thread and be expected to answer as quickly as they do with threads that have just one suggestion (guideline 4 found dead in a ditch)
if you happen to have been called out in this thread don't take it too personally, it's normal to get a little silly if "rules" are not enforced, but be mindful that you can't pretend the seriousness and timeliness you deserve if this is how it is
i could have gone for longer with threads but i can't bother reading 4 years worth of threads history to prove a very valid point in my honest opinion, i mostly chose threads that were brought up recently and that have been ignored for some time / been answered very late / are still early but i needed examples
i might consider writing a post about guideline 3, involving proper regulation on duplicates i have never seen to avoid getting a post ignored just because it was declined 4 years ago, so if you like this post i might actually do that
i hope this thread enforces the idea that if we want to have better forums we should start by being the change it needs, but also needs to deserve, instead of throwing piles of dirt on volunteers because you don't feel listened (read guideline 7 and 9)
Last edited: