Eh IMO this thread is justified as a free market system breaks down if an appropriate evaluation of value does not take place. If the market can't make good judgments of a fair trade, then a system breaks down and demand will be overshot or undershot (Right now it is incredibly unfufiled)
The point is that a set "value" of dollars in terms of gold (or vice versa) is completely and utterly imaginary. A store trade is based on 2 factors: what the store trader wants to receive per dollar and what the player who wants something from the store is willing to pay for the store item. If both parties agree on a value that is below your idea of what gold is worth in terms of dollars, then nothing happens. The world doesn't implode, the server doesn't stop working, the economy isn't lost and both parties leave the store trade satisfied.
I simply don't really see a point in this thread. If a store trader wants more than the "usual" 1k/$ but a player doesn't want to pay that, then it's bad luck peanut butter, but that's on the player and not on the store trader; the store trader has every right to ask for more. However, if there are also other store traders around that do want to buy something for the 1k/$ rate, then I see no problem in that either. Overall, I think it's the store trader's responsibility what they ask for their store trade and so I think it's their responsibility to know the ins and outs of the current economy. I therefore don't think it's justified to make this thread in order to "determine" what the price for store trades should be, because quite frankly, store traders should be free to decide that for themselves.
In my opinion, the store trade ratio should stay the same because after you've spent all your gold getting the revelius essentials, you'd be left with nothing and would struggle so much to get more and I have several pending suggestions on increasing the amount of gold to get from the things I mentioned above, and I do believe gold pre-revelius was much easier to get. The best broom was 2,000 gold only, and you could get more than 1000 gold per day doing chest runs. Now that this is gone, and revelius sucked all the gold from the economy, I don't believe the store trade ratio should change, but then again this is just my take and people are free to choose whatever ratio they like. Just looking at it from a statistical point of view.
Agree to disagree, but surely that's the responsibility of the store trader? If they want more than the usual 1k per dollar, and whoever wants a store item doesn't want to pay that, then the latter doesn't get their required store item, so it's their problem, not the store trader's.I disagree with this. The issue is that the two parties are not negotiating a fair price, the person that wants the store trade has a mentality that 1k=1$ and thinks that anything other than that is unfair. The purpose of this thread is to change that mentality.
I would disagree with this to be honest. Although the quests give a lot of gold, and although getting gold is "easier" now, this gold is very temporary. The gold you get from quests can look huge at first but the amount of gold you'd need to get gear and reset and get gear again everytime you go up a year takes up soooooo much gold.
Agree to disagree, but surely that's the responsibility of the store trader? If they want more than the usual 1k per dollar, and whoever wants a store item doesn't want to pay that, then the latter doesn't get their required store item, so it's their problem, not the store trader's.
I agree that this thread likely won't change that, but its a good place to start a discussion (as we are doing now)If enough store traders want more then the mentality changes itself, a forum thread isn't going to change that.
I disagree with this. The issue is that the two parties are not negotiating a fair price, the person that wants the store trade has a mentality that 1k=1$ and thinks that anything other than that is unfair. The purpose of this thread is to change that mentality.
I agree that this thread likely won't change that, but its a good place to start a discussion (as we are doing now)![]()
You think all store traders actively read the forums? Because I don't think so. Again, mentality will only change when store traders are actively applying a new exchange rate in-game, shouting from the forums isn't going to actively change that.1 Store Trader can't do that alone - that's why the thread is called "Calling all Store Traders" - cause it's meant to provoke a mutual agreement maybe?
Maybe stop being so condescending towards people that don't fully agree with you? I never even disagreed with you on the notion that the rate should increase, but just because I criticise the existence of this thread, you find it necessary to start acting all condescending towards me?you get it yeh?
You apologise for naming and shaming someone who simply votes for a poll option that you don't agree with, but quite frankly, I don't really think you're being sincere when only moments later you say this:Agree, regretted posting it but there is no remove button on here!sorry, but the point is made still. This came prior to people voting on the thread without even reading it's intentions also. Again apologies to Roman
How can you expect to be taken seriously after apologising for something you repeat shortly after apologising?! Some people just disagree with you on the notion that the rate should increase, and quite frankly, they are free to disagree. Sal for instance came out with his disagreement and gave quite a number of interesting points on the matter. As stated before, I disagree with Sal on this but surely that would be no reason to act all condescending towards him, or anyone else for that matter, just because they have a different view on this matter?I am sorry for pointing out Roman earlier, but anyone who is genuinely voting 1000-1499 isn't playing on the same server, and I'm really surprised at some of the names.
Something that is your opinion isn't "blatantly obvious", other people can disagree. An opinion is never obvious, people can disagree for all sorts of reasons and quite frankly, it doesn't really help your thread if you're going to act so rudely towards everyone who disagrees with you even in the smallest of ways.It's so blatantly obvious that the value is no longer 1000 Gold and hasn't been even before revelius!
You think all store traders actively read the forums?
Maybe stop being so condescending towards people that don't fully agree with you? I never even disagreed with you on the notion that the rate should increase, but just because I criticise the existence of this thread, you find it necessary to start acting all condescending towards me?
Just checking you got the point - you seemed to not understand why I was even on here.I simply don't really see a point in this thread
A completelety viable statement - because anyone who thinks that that is the value of gold - musn't be playing on the same server xDI don't really think you're being sincere when only moments later you say this
but anyone who is genuinely voting 1000-1499 isn't playing on the same server, and I'm really surprised at some of the names.
Didn't repeat what I did, again made a totally viable statement.How can you expect to be taken seriously after apologising for something you repeat shortly after apologising?!
Sal and many others have spoken on here and have all received professional replies - I shouldn't have done what I did earlier with roman - was childish of me. You seem to be here to argue about things irrelevant to the actual thread. So can we please take this to inbox if you would like to continue rather than destroying a thread?Sal for instance came out with his disagreement and gave quite a number of interesting points on the matter. As stated before, I disagree with Sal on this but surely that would be no reason to act all condescending towards him, or anyone else for that matter, just because they have a different view on this matter?
Sorry let me extend that then - Blatantly obvious to me, so maybe that's why I'm so flabbergasted that so many people have the opinion that they do. We are all here respecting opinions and like I said when Sal gave his opinion (about the actual reason for the thread) he was met with a reply (about the thread).Something that is your opinion isn't "blatantly obvious", other people can disagree. An opinion is never obvious, people can disagree for all sorts of reasons and quite frankly, it doesn't really help your thread if you're going to act so rudely towards everyone who disagrees with you even in the smallest of ways.
No thats why I've been advertising this on the server and on discord.
Just checking you got the point - you seemed to not understand why I was even on here.
A completelety viable statement - because anyone who thinks that that is the value of gold - musn't be playing on the same server xD
Didn't repeat what I did, again made a totally viable statement.
Sal and many others have spoken on here and have all received professional replies - I shouldn't have done what I did earlier with roman - was childish of me. You seem to be here to argue about things irrelevant to the actual thread. So can we please take this to inbox if you would like to continue rather than destroying a thread?
Sorry let me extend that then - Blatantly obvious to me, so maybe that's why I'm so flabbergasted that so many people have the opinion that they do. We are all here respecting opinions and like I said when Sal gave his opinion (about the actual reason for the thread) he was met with a reply (about the thread).
taking the attention off of what I made the thread about and have even said yourself you agree with it, but never gave your opinion on that. You came into this with the wrong head looking for an argument because of how I acted with Roman - and like I said, that was my bad.criticise[d] the existence of this thread
Okay a more "serious" reply from me this time
In my opinion 1k-1.5k is fine as inflation happens and that, but as Sal said getting these large amounts of gold is only temporary. Basically I think it's up to the person who is PAYING to decide what the ratio is. If the person paying gold think's it's fair and pays the gold the person paying the money wants, I don't see an issue at all. You can charge whatever price/ratio you want, but people will always go with the cheaper person if they find one, it's just common sense imo.
You can say what you want, try to persuade people to agree with you, but the opposing side has their own opinions and points.
Also this thread's replies seem to becoming more of an argument, so maybe try not to come across as this "aggressive" in your messages - I know nobody intends to but it can seem that way lol
Okay a more "serious" reply from me this time
In my opinion 1k-1.5k is fine as inflation happens and that, but as Sal said getting these large amounts of gold is only temporary. Basically I think it's up to the person who is PAYING to decide what the ratio is. If the person paying gold think's it's fair and pays the gold the person paying the money wants, I don't see an issue at all. You can charge whatever price/ratio you want, but people will always go with the cheaper person if they find one, it's just common sense imo.
You can say what you want, try to persuade people to agree with you, but the opposing side has their own opinions and points.
Also this thread's replies seem to becoming more of an argument, so maybe try not to come across as this "aggressive" in your messages - I know nobody intends to but it can seem that way lol
In my opinion 1k-1.5k is fine as inflation happens and that, but as Sal said getting these large amounts of gold is only temporary. Basically I think it's up to the person who is PAYING to decide what the ratio is. If the person paying gold think's it's fair and pays the gold the person paying the money wants, I don't see an issue at all. You can charge whatever price/ratio you want, but people will always go with the cheaper person if they find one, it's just common sense imo.
While what you and sal brought up about gold being a short term burst is true, it doesn't change the fundamental issue of the demand for gold being low. Once people get their cash stack, buy a broom and decent gear (Unless you are going pure legendaries, it can be done quite economical), there really isn't much left to spend gold on. Before rev, professions used to be the huge money sink that endgame players could poor tens of thousands on, now it's just collectibles (And that market is dwindling too, as people don't need gold and in turn don't sell collectibles). In my years of playing, I've seen a pretty strong trend between events/activities that demand gold (Think Halloween even during the 5th ani event where the gold to USD was all the way to 750 gold:1). In summary, the demand for gold is far outpaced by the demand for store trades, especially in comparison to pre rev. Does that mean no store trades are happening for 1k? No, there is still some demand for gold even at that rate, but at the same time, all demand for store trades won't be fulfilled until the rate rises.
but anyone who actually thinks that the value is still 1k/$ is kidding themselves :')
surely that's the responsibility of the store trader? If they want more than the usual 1k per dollar, and whoever wants a store item doesn't want to pay that, then the latter doesn't get their required store item, so it's their problem, not the store trader's.
Basically I think it's up to the person who is PAYING to decide what the ratio is. If the person paying gold think's it's fair and pays the gold the person paying the money wants, I don't see an issue at all. You can charge whatever price/ratio you want, but people will always go with the cheaper person if they find one.